More info
Description / Abstract:
This recommended practice presents a rationale for developing
emission limits and immunity test levels and recommends that these
facets are representative of current practice and user needs.
Emission limits generally are written by national and international
standards bodies. Emission limits for the most part are specified
by regulators, which is the case in the U.S. and Canada. Such
regulatory limits take precedence, even if the limits are different
from those considered in this document. In the U.S. and Canada,
product immunity is not regulated except for some safety equipment.
In this way, adequate immunity is more a quality aspect of the
product as if it does not operate in its intended RF environment,
the user would deem it of poor quality. It should be noted that the
entire document does not impose normative requirements, but
recommends options.
Purpose
The main purpose of this recommended practice is to aid
manufacturers who might need to modify the emissions their products
generate (as long as regulatory limits are met) to meet for example
intra-system needs for their products. There might also be a need
to have different (higher) immunity test levels than what is
typically required if the product will be used in severe
electromagnetic environments. As the use of electronics is
constantly changing (e.g., the Smart Grid [B10]1), the test
methods, immunity test levels, and emission limits likewise need to
be periodically reviewed to assure that EMC is maintained. In fact,
these EMC considerations might have to be tailored for specific
designs and go beyond regulatory requirements to ensure proper
product operation at the user location, which is exposed to a
myriad of RF environments and where it is likely that there are
other electronic products that might suffer interference from RF
generated by the product. The emissions and immunity measurement
technique used can have an impact on the accuracy, repeatability,
and reproducibility of the test results. Emissions from products
should be controlled to protect radio services by not causing
interference, and at the same time, products should have sufficient
immunity to be able to operate as intended in the RF environments
expected in locations where the products are intended to be
used.
As part of the development of emission limits and immunity test
levels, the following topics are discussed in this recommended
practice:
a) The general properties of both man-made and natural
environmental electromagnetic noise (disturbances), as this will
impact the product immunity test levels and immunity tests that are
needed so that a product performs within manufacturer’s
specifications in the intended use environments
b) Selection, capabilities, and use of proper emissions
measurement instrumentation.
c) The test instrumentation used to simulate the RF environment
to which products are expected to be exposed so that the products
work properly with minimal customer EMC complaints.
d) A defensible rationale that can be used in selecting a
consistent set of limits for emissions and test levels for
immunity,2 subject to good engineering practice and cost-effective
EMC management, taking into account any regulatory requirements.
Topic a) through topic
d) of this subclause are intended to be applicable to individual
products as well as systems of various sizes and, if properly
applied, provide guidance for obtaining both intrasystem and
intersystem electromagnetic compatibility. This recommended
practice assists manufacturers in specifying their own emissions
limits (but as a minimum meeting regulatory and user requirements)
and test levels as appropriate for their product to function
properly and to not cause any undesired interference.
NOTE—Emission limits and immunity test levels along with the
necessary measurement techniques described herein are proposed for
general use to the extent that they are not covered in regulations
or in customer requirements.